| Please dont call this education... |
 |
 |
 |
| Written by Andrew | |
| Sunday, 10 December 2006 19:23 | |
|
First 'intelligent design' (which is somewhat lacking in the intelligent part). And now, 'nullility'. Seriously. This is apparently a solution to a 1200 year old problem. It's just retarded, and not even funny. It's like ocming up with random crap (I have one called the 'one constant'. ¥ constant (yen sign) = 1. Now lets take an equation, f=ma. No no, thats wrong. F¥ = m¥a¥. Better!). Read on for oldskool IRC flaming. Outraged IRC exercpts; MNF: And if the programmer had any brains, when writing the software for the flight controller, HE'D CHECK BEFORE DIVIDING TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S NOT A DIVISION BY ZERO IN THE FIRST PLACE GRARR <Pandya> but why? <Pandya> oh because you cant dvidide by zero... <Pandya> but wait! yes you can <Pandya> nullility! <Pandya> err0r. <Steep> :/ if u can divide 0 then when does maths finish? <Steep> i mean... the sum could go on forever <Pandya> thats the whole point I think <Avoc> yes! Lets follow Dr. Anderson! <Pandya> instead of having a sum that goes on for ever, make some crap up and give it a silly name <CallMeMASTERNightfall> Not that, you'd just plug a meaningless number 'nullity' into the next calcluation <Avoc> his name is Anderson! Its the matrix all over <Pandya> whats the point of having a number you can use when the number is completely useless in the first place <Pandya> its like me saying, from now on, six is no longer called six, it's called pandar <Pandya> pandar / 3 = 2. <Pandya> lets teaach that in school insteaad :/ <CallMeMASTERNightfall> So after you go through all of them, you'll end up with 'nullity' congratu-freaking-lations, good job wasting all those CPU cycles, when you could have jumped past the rest of the computations BACK WHEN YOUR CHECK noticed that you are dividing by zero <Avoc> lol I can invent numbers too <Avoc> lol if 3.14159... is Pi and x/0 is "nullity" then the square root of 2 is hereby known as "omegatron." Its symbol consists of many lines forming a snowflake inscribed in an irregular shape. <Avoc> "this guy solved the problem simply because he defined a solution to the problem that's like a student being asked what 0 - 1 is, and responding "booby" saying that "booby" is the result of subtracting one from zero there are no viable mathematical proofs, or applications for this "nullity"" |
|
| Last Updated ( Sunday, 10 December 2006 19:24 ) |